Tuesday 24 February 2009

UEFA insensitivity is nothing new

It appears that UEFA have decided to put Liverpool supporters through the mill yet again. Not content with labelling them the lowest of the low and changing the venue of one of the Reds' Champions League away fixtures at very short notice, they have now refused to rule out the possibility of forcing the club to play on April 15 - a highly emotional day for anyone associated with Liverpool Football Club.

On that date 20 years ago, ninety six Liverpool supporters set off to Sheffield for the FA Cup semi final with Nottingham Forest at Hillsborough stadium. Those same 96 people did not return home. They died watching the team they loved on terrace that was rammed beyond capacity in the Leppings Lane end of the ground. This was the darkest day in the history of the club. Red and blue stood side by side as the city of Liverpool was united in grief for the victims. Every year on April 15, supporters join survivors and the bereaved families of those who perished to pay their respects in a memorial service at Anfield. At 3.06pm, the exact time that the game was halted, a minute's silence is held. Local radio stations halt broadcasting for the moment of reflection followed by the playing of 
‘You'll Never Walk Alone' by Gerry and the Pacemakers - the club's anthem.

Hillsborough is not just a painful memory for the survivors and those who lost loved ones as a result of the disaster, whether it were in the tragedy itself or the aftermath, its shadow still hangs over the Anfield and city of Liverpool to this day. It touched the lives of people not only in England but across the world. One of the most notable examples was during a European Cup semi final between AC Milan and Real Madrid - Liverpool's opponents next week - held four days after the disaster. Six minutes into the game, the referee stopped play and a minute's silence was held as a mark of respect. Halfway through it the home supporters in the San Siro began to sing 
‘You'll Never Walk Alone'.

UEFA, however, do not care. To them Liverpool's past is irrelevant. They are now seen as a blemish on the good name of football. This animosity dates back to May 1985 and more specifically the Heysel disaster. Thirty-nine people, predominantly Juventus supporters, were killed following the collapse of a wall inside the stadium before the European Cup final between the two sides amidst violent confrontations on the terraces. UEFA laid the blame solely at Liverpool's door but days after the disaster their chief observer Gunter Schneider remarked 'Only the English fans were responsible. Of that there is no doubt.' Schneider's statement is backed up by several UK based Juventus fans who were at Heysel and claim that fans of several English clubs were in Brussels solely for the match that night and that they were not all Liverpool followers. Despite this observation Liverpool and their supporters were seen as the sole culprits and had the blame bestowed upon them by other English clubs who were banned from Europe for five years. Liverpool received an additional year in exile for their 'part' in the disaster.

Their love-hate relationship with UEFA has intensified as recent times have proved. Cynics have pointed to UEFA president Michel Platini - vice captain of Juventus and the only scorer in the '85 final - for the seemingly anti-Liverpool stance the federation has taken since his appointment in 2007. Scathing comments he made about Liverpool in 2005 shortly before the 20
th anniversary of Heysel have been highlighted to prove this theory. The comments came less than a fortnight after he had walked onto the Anfield pitch to a standing ovation before the Champions League quarter final between the two clubs to receive a plaque on behalf of Juventus from Liverpool as part of a series of apologetic gestures. In the days that followed Heysel, Platini himself was criticised heavily for his lack of restraint in celebrating the win given the circumstances in which the game had taken place.

Twenty two years on from the horror of Heysel, Liverpool and Platini came face to face again at the showpiece of his inaugural year as president. Athens' Olympic Stadium provided the backdrop for the Champions League final with AC Milan - a repeat of the final two years previous in Istanbul. As with Heysel, events off the field of play overshadowed the Italians' 2-1 victory. Basic facilities for accommodating a game of such magnitude were not in effect with no toilets inside the stadium and no turnstiles to admit fans in operation. This led to chaotic scenes outside the stadium with thousands of supporters with legitimate tickets stranded outside. Director of Communications William Gaillard claimed the next morning that the problems in Greece were typical of the behaviour of Liverpool's supporters, claiming that federation had 23 incidents on file of similar behaviour dating back as far as 2003. He also branded the club's supporters the worst in Europe despite previously stating that Liverpool had 'a tradition of good behaviour' and less than a fortnight after he had admitted that that the stadium was not built nor equipped to stage a showpiece final. In this scathing attack he asked,
 'What other set of fans steal tickets from their fellow supporters or out of the hands of children?' He added'We know what happened in Athens and Liverpool fans were the cause of most of the trouble there'.

Club representatives and politicians all lobbied UEFA to retract their statement with evidence disproving the claims with the then UK sports minister Richard Caborn meeting with Platini to clear Liverpool's name. Following the meeting the Frenchman reneged on Gaillard's comments by saying, 'No they are not the worst behaved in Europe. It's official, they are not the worst behaved.' The retraction was a major embarrassment for UEFA and one that has seen them viewed in a questionable light ever since.

For the second time in eighteen months UEFA angered Liverpool's supporters this time with their decision to suspend Atletico Madrid - one of the club's opponents in this year's Champions League - from playing European games at the Vicente Calderon Stadium. The decision came after racist chanting by Madrid's supporters at Marseille players during their Group D match at the beginning of October. In addition to a €500,000 fine, Atletico were ordered to play remaining two home ties against Liverpool and PSV Eindhoven at a neutral venue at least 300km away from the Spanish capital with Valencia and Seville touted as the probable locations. The decision and its timing incensed travelling fans who had pre-booked flights and accommodation for Madrid. Atletico appealed on the ruling and due to the last minute change of venue inconveniencing the thousands of Liverpool's travelling contingent, UEFA wavered the ban for the game. Despite this the federation was severely criticized for announcing the initial decision to move the game eight days before the tie took place.

The possibility of Liverpool playing on April 15 is one that concerns the club who had to appeal to the Premier League over a similar situation in 2006 when their visit to Blackburn Rovers was scheduled for that date - 17 years to the day of the tragedy in Sheffield. Supporters believe that the club should never play on that day out of respect for those who died following the team they loved and were outraged by the league's decision. The game at Ewood Park was put back 24 hours and the situation was avoided. However it could rear its ugly head again after UEFA announced that the quarter final stages of the Champions League will be held on April 14 and 15. Should Liverpool beat Real Madrid in the knockout stages they may be forced to play on the 20th anniversary of Hillsborough. With this in mind the club have written to UEFA to ask for them to consider allowing the Reds to play any potential tie a day earlier as a march of respect. European football's governing body claimed they could offer ‘no guarantees' that the Reds will not have to play on April 15 which has upset and incensed the club's supporters.

Would UEFA demand that Juventus, Platini's former club, play on the anniversary of the Heysel tragedy? Would Olympiakos be told not to mourn those who died in the Karaiskakis Stadium disaster all for the sake of a game? Likewise with Manchester United and the Munich air disaster. It's hard to tell unless those clubs are in a similar situation to the one Liverpool could be in should they progress in the Champions League. Football is a game that is loved with a passion but remembering the loss of human life in a football ground twenty years ago is more important to some than the stellar names and epic draws that Europe's premier club competition now boasts.